Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH 08/29] wl12xx: configure sleep_policy according to active roles

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Luciano Coelho <coelho@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 10:12 +0200, Eliad Peller wrote:
>> If there is an active AP role, stay always on.
>> Otherwise, allow chip to enter elp.
>>
>> (Note that this is a global configuration, so if the
>> device is already configured according to our policy,
>> we don't have to configure it again)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eliad Peller <eliad@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>
> [...]
>
>> @@ -573,13 +563,38 @@ static int wl12xx_init_ap_role(struct wl1271 *wl, struct wl12xx_vif *wlvif)
>>
>>  int wl1271_init_vif_specific(struct wl1271 *wl, struct ieee80211_vif *vif)
>>  {
>> -     struct wl12xx_vif *wlvif = wl12xx_vif_to_data(vif);
>> +     struct wl12xx_vif *iter, *wlvif = wl12xx_vif_to_data(vif);
>>       struct conf_tx_ac_category *conf_ac;
>>       struct conf_tx_tid *conf_tid;
>>       bool is_ap = (wlvif->bss_type == BSS_TYPE_AP_BSS);
>> -
>> +     u8 sta_roles_cnt = 0, ap_roles_cnt = 0;
>>       int ret, i;
>>
>> +     wl12xx_for_each_wlvif(wl, iter) {
>> +             if (iter->bss_type == BSS_TYPE_AP_BSS)
>> +                     ap_roles_cnt++;
>> +             else
>> +                     sta_roles_cnt++;
>> +     }
>> +
>> +     /*
>> +      * consider all existing roles before configuring psm.
>> +      * TODO: reconfigure on interface removal.
>> +      */
>> +     if (!ap_roles_cnt) {
>> +             if (is_ap) {
>> +                     /* Configure for power always on */
>> +                     ret = wl1271_acx_sleep_auth(wl, WL1271_PSM_CAM);
>> +                     if (ret < 0)
>> +                             return ret;
>> +             } else if (!sta_roles_cnt) {
>> +                     /* Configure for ELP power saving */
>> +                     ret = wl1271_acx_sleep_auth(wl, WL1271_PSM_ELP);
>> +                     if (ret < 0)
>> +                             return ret;
>> +             }
>> +     }
>> +
>
> Wouldn't it be much simpler to have a "have_ap" element in the wl
> struct?
>
>
have_ap is not enough, because there might be multiple aps, and we
need to consider it on removal.
we can use ap_count, if you prefer it that way.

Eliad.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux