On Sat, 2011-10-08 at 21:19 +0200, Arik Nemtsov wrote: > On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 23:17, Luciano Coelho <coelho@xxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 23:03 +0200, Shahar Lev wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > Maybe you should also change that? :-) > >> > >> Consider it added to our collective TODO. > > > > Well, the fix is probably supposed to be done in mac80211, instead of > > hiding the bug by removing the warning, isn't it? > > Sometimes data is sent when the IBSS interface is not connected. > wl12xx handles this correctly by throwing the packets. In this sense > there's no "bug". > All this patch does is remove warning messages that confuse the users > (and developers). > > I agree fixing mac80211 is the better thing to do, and we'll get to it > when time permits. Okay, not a big problem to do this in the driver. But what I meant with "the bug" was that, if this can be avoided in mac80211, why not do it there? Is it a a big effort to do it in mac80211? -- Cheers, Luca. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html