On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 10:23 +0300, Victor Goldenshtein wrote: > On 26/09/2011 09:25, Luciano Coelho wrote: > >>> I checked this a bit further and I don't see the point in sending all > >>> packets here. In fact, if block_tx is set, we can't even send any more > >>> frames until the switch happens (or fails). So we should at least check > >>> this here. > >> The block_tx is taken into account in the mac layer. > > > > This is a bit strange, though. I checked the code and nobody seems to > > be using the block_tx element of ieee80211_channel_switch, so I wonder > > why it's there at all. > > > > As far as I know the block_tx is for the DFS channel switch > implementation, when block_tx=1, the firmware will not start tx on new > channel. I'll check this up with our firmware team. -- Cheers, Luca. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
