On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 14:40, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> The race is even worse - from queuing until the actual Tx, we could >> have disconnected from this AP and connected do a totally different >> one. But this shouldn't happen in reality (and we can add some guards >> to wpa_supplicant to make sure). >> Do you see this as a security threat? > > I don't really know :-) I just saw the possible race here. If you remove > the TDLS station entries when disassociating then it shouldn't be an > issue, right? Since you require a station entry pretty early on anyway. As discussed on IRC - this race is not really an issue. In the next version of the patch stations will be purged by kernel-mode on disassociation. Arik -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html