Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> bottom line - i'm not sure about all the details, but according to >> their tests - it does improve the throughput. >> (i can try getting better details if you have additional questions) > > It'd be interesting to see if we can just treat this as a "minimum awake > time", kinda like going back to the range I thought about earlier. Yeah. Or maybe have a separate event to postpone dynps timer or something like that (if firmware informs host whenever there's coex traffic). One extreme is that wl12xx would set IEEE80211_HW_SUPPORTS_DYNAMIC_PS and reimplement the dynps timer in the driver. That way the driver would have full control how it works and not complicate the mac80211 implementation. -- Kalle Valo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
