On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 09:31 +0300, Victor Goldenshtein wrote: > On 07/09/2011 12:26, Johannes Berg wrote: > >> The intermediate scan event is not HW dependent, so there is no need to > >> advertise it.. > > > > Not with mac80211 drivers, but with cfg80211 drivers? > > > > johannes > > > > You're right, cfg80211 drivers will not support it. As I couldn't find a > way to know whether it mac or cfg based driver, I can add also > IEEE80211_HW_SUPPORTS_IM_RESULT" flag (as with cancel_scan) and then > will advertise the nl80211 command if it set, is it OK? I'd prefer not advertising the command, since so far we've only advertised supported commands as supported -- a new nl80211 flag would be nicer I think. Come to think of it, maybe it's time to bundle capability flags together. We seem to acquire new ones all the time, so maybe we should have a HW_CAPABILITY nl80211 attribute that can simply grow as needed ... johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
