On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 4:45 AM, John W. Linville <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 12:21:29PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: >> Thomas Pedersen <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > Since v1 of the mesh gate series was accidentally applied, revert >> > the relevant v1s and apply the v2s. >> >> This looks ugly in the git history. IMHO it would be cleaner that you >> would do a diff between series v1 and v2 and submit that as a proper >> patch. >> >> But John might think otherwise, better to wait for his comment. > > That is how I would prefer it as well. As a general rule, should we treat patchsets sent to the list atomically? I.e. if there are objections to a few patches in the set, should we resubmit a v2 of the whole patchset? (Before asking I tried to find that info here: http://linuxwireless.org/en/developers/Documentation/SubmittingPatches . I'll be happy to update the wiki with your response if you think it's relevant) Cheers, Javier -- Javier Cardona cozybit Inc. http://www.cozybit.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
