On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 17:58 +0800, 李朝明 wrote: > > ============================================================== > /* > * RSNA-protected unicast frames should always be > * sent with pairwise or station-to-station keys, > * but for WEP we allow using a key index as well. > */ > if (rx->key && > rx->key->conf.cipher != WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_WEP40 && > rx->key->conf.cipher != WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_WEP104 && > !is_multicast_ether_addr(hdr->addr1)) > rx->key = NULL; > ============================================================== > > because not only WEP, but IBSS WPA-NONE will also use Group for both > receiving > and sending unicast and multicast packets. > > So I want to ask, why we can't receive WPA-NONE packets here ? Will > WPA-NONE > packets cause other issues ? Well, we'd have to make this depend on WPA-NONE somehow I think. Do you have to support WPA-NONE or would you be happy with proper RSN IBSS, which you can implement now? johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
