On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 22:54:20 +0200 Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I didn't expect improvement, I tried to make it worse :P I though our > problems may be coming from not-fast-enough reading RX ring. So you > just made that ring even smaller to allow faster/easier errors. > > What do you mean by different errors? The only one I can see is > "b43-phy0 ERROR: PHY transmission error". Do you mean that or > something else? Did you post all the log you wanted to? Maybe missed > beginning? That's it. On your question "what do you mean by different errors", I mean the reported errors are different. Without that patch the reported error is: b43-phy0 debug: TX-status contains invalid cookie: 0x0DCE b43-phy0 debug: Out of order TX status report on DMA ring 1. Expected 74, but got 76 b43-phy0 debug: Out of order TX status report on DMA ring 1. Expected 74, but got 78 ... and so on. Chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
