On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 06:53:12PM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> .. again, I'll just point out that because I was seeing this when the
> PCU honestly had hit the end of the RX descriptor list (lots of radar
> phyerr frames), I needed to kick the PCU to start again.
>
so without PCU restart you are still getting rxeol. am i right?
> Are you not seeing this? if not, why are you receiving the interrupt? :-)
>
Under heavy bidi traffic test, RXEOL was observed. But it never be enabled
again after processing rx bufs.
>
> Adrian
>
> On 13 August 2011 12:58, Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Once RXEOL was disabled, it never be enabled again. This patch
> > re-enables rxeol at the end of rx tasklet.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/recv.c | 5 +++++
> > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/recv.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/recv.c
> > index 7409402..c0c66e0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/recv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/recv.c
> > @@ -1978,5 +1978,10 @@ requeue:
> >
> > spin_unlock_bh(&sc->rx.rxbuflock);
> >
> > + if (!(ah->imask & ATH9K_INT_RXEOL)) {
> > + ah->imask |= (ATH9K_INT_RXEOL | ATH9K_INT_RXORN);
> > + ath9k_hw_set_interrupts(ah, ah->imask);
> > + }
> > +
> > return 0;
> > }
> > --
> > 1.7.6
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
