W dniu 11 sierpnia 2011 18:21 użytkownik Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx> napisał: > W dniu 11 sierpnia 2011 18:04 użytkownik John W. Linville > <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> napisał: >> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:05:19AM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >>> W dniu 11 sierpnia 2011 06:39 użytkownik Larry Finger >>> <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> napisał: >>> > On 08/10/2011 07:14 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >>> >> >>> >> W dniu 10 sierpnia 2011 20:35 użytkownik Rafał Miłecki >>> >> <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx> napisał: >>> >>> >>> >>> Some hardware with 64-bit DMA uses lower address word for setting >>> >>> routing (translation) bit. Add workaround for such boards. >>> >>> >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki<zajec5@xxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> --- >>> >>> This requires testing on at least 1 normal 64-bit DMA card and 1 32-bit >>> >>> DMA card. So far it was tested only on my 14e4:4329 where it fixed DMA. >>> >> >>> >> 14e4:4353 (BCM43224), 64-bit DMA, still works :) >>> >> >>> >> The rest will follow tomorrow. >>> > >>> > Tested with 14e4:4311 (64-bit) and 14e4:4318 (32-bit). The ssb changes were >>> > also tested with b43legacy. >>> >>> Thanks Larry. >>> >>> I've additionally tested this on 14e4:4312 (BCM4311), 32-bit DMA. Works OK. >>> >>> John: please take this patchset. >> >> Are these fixes intended for 3.1? > > The bug in DMA support is in the driver since the first moment we > enabled support for N-PHY. It's not any kind of regression. However, > it's still a bug fix. > > If it's OK to take that for 3.1, then go on. I believe it received > required testing. On the other hand, if it's going to make Dave or > Linus angry, leave it for 3.2. We have this bug since 2.6.39, we can > have it for one more release. s/Dave/David/, sorry -- Rafał -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
