Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH v3 11/13] ath9k_hw: Disable Walsh spatial spreading for 2 chains

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



There's already code in the driver that subtracts 3 and 5 dB from the
max TX power.

Some NICs have value=0 for pwrdecrease2chain and pwrdecrease3chain; I
have a feeling the EEPROMs in those have been programmed assuming 2 or
3 chain TX with the current setting (ie, AR_PHY_FC_WALSH in
AR_PHY_TURBO). If they've calibrated the EEPROM settings based on that
bit being set for 2 or 3 chain TX, you may find they're already doing
the "right" thing. Flipping that bit off (and unconditionally
subtracting TX power) may result in a lower TX power than regulatory?

I do suggest that someone with the relevant test equipment do some
investigation into what the behaviour is of a variety of NICs. I'd
love to survey what's going on but I'd have to acquire access to a
spectrum analyser.



Adrian

On 5 August 2011 10:54, Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 08:23:28PM +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> On 2011-08-04 7:54 PM, Rajkumar Manoharan wrote:
>> >The Walsh bit is disabled for regulatory consideration.
>> >
>> >As per the FCC rulings, only transmissions that are completely
>> >non-coherent, are allowed to waive the array gain contribution
>> >to EIRP for multi-transmit configurations. The use of 2-stream
>> >with 2 transmit and use of 3-steam with 3 transmit qualifies
>> >for this spatial multiplexing MIMO classification as long as
>> >the streams are directly mapped to each radio (not Walsh spread
>> >prior to splitting to multiple radios)
>> I think ath9k does not waive the array gain contribution. I haven't
>> checked AR9003, but on AR9002 and older, it explicitly includes the
>> array gain contribution in the tx power limit calculation. I'm not
>> sure that unconditionally disabling spatial spreading is the right
>> way to deal with this.
>>
> We might violate the FCC rule with 2x2 config(3dB higher at 2-stream)
> if this bit is enabled. Based on chainmask we can disable Walsh bit.
> Any comments?
>
> --
> Rajkumar
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux