On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 20:10:44 +0200 Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2011/6/1 Chris Vine <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 20:03:56 +0200 > > Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> 2011/6/1 Chris Vine <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >> > The one which failed caused the cessation of > >> > wireless traffic, and was accompanied by the debug log reports of > >> > out of order TX status earlier referred to, and with only one > >> > single report > >> > >> As I said, I don't really suspect any relation between full TX ring > >> and out of order problems anymore. > >> > >> But it won't hurt to ask just in case: > >> Did you see relation between this single "Stopped TX ring 1" and > >> massive out of order messages? Did out of order messages starter > >> right after "Stopped TX ring 1" one? > > > > The "Stopped TX ring 1" message was near the end (but not at the > > end) of the out of order messages. It was definitely not at the > > beginning of the out of order messages. > > Thanks. That confirmed for me, there is no relation. I have tested with the newer firmware (from broadcom-wl-5.10.56.27.3), and I get the same failure with "Out of order TX status report on DMA ring 1" after transferring about 380MB of data at full speed. Chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
