On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 10:49:55 +0200 Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > W dniu 23 lipca 2011 10:37 użytkownik Michael Büsch <m@xxxxxxx> napisał: > > On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 11:10:11 +0200 > > Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> They are SPROM specific, so all should be defined in ssb code. > > > > Oh, well. I'm not sure. > > Most of these currently are defined in b43 code, because they are b43-specific > > and _not_ ssb specific. If we decide to define them in ssb, they need to be > > removed from b43, at least. > > Well, SPROM is board specific (not 80211 core specific), so I believe > the same applies to boardflags, doesn't it? Boardflags are read from > SPROM, so it makes sense for me. No. Most of these flags are specific to the whole device (the board). Most flags are invalid or have another meaning for b44, for instance. -- Greetings, Michael. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
