Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH] bcma: fix 'SSB_PCICORE_BFL_NOPCI' undeclared build breakage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



W dniu 22 lipca 2011 23:35 użytkownik Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx> napisał:
> 2011/7/22 John W. Linville <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> linux-next-20110722/drivers/bcma/driver_pci.c:175: error: 'SSB_PCICORE_BFL_NOPCI' undeclared (first use in this function)
>>
>> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/bcma/driver_pci.c |    2 ++
>>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/bcma/driver_pci.c b/drivers/bcma/driver_pci.c
>> index dc6f34a..745d264 100644
>> --- a/drivers/bcma/driver_pci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/bcma/driver_pci.c
>> @@ -172,8 +172,10 @@ static bool bcma_core_pci_is_in_hostmode(struct bcma_drv_pci *pc)
>>            chipid_top != 0x5300)
>>                return false;
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SSB_DRIVER_PCICORE
>>        if (bus->sprom.boardflags_lo & SSB_PCICORE_BFL_NOPCI)
>>                return false;
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_SSB_DRIVER_PCICORE */
>>
>>  #if 0
>>        /* TODO: on BCMA we use address from EROM instead of magic formula */
>
> Huh, I've no idea why do we have such a mess with boardflags.
>
> SPROM is board specific, not core specific. There is no such thing
> like core-specific boardflags.
>
> Currently we define boardflags in every driver that is doing to use them:
> #define SSB_PCICORE_BFL_NOPCI           0x00000400 /* Board leaves PCI floating */
>
> #define SSB_GIGE_BFL_ROBOSWITCH             0x0010
>
> #define B43_BFL_BTCOEXIST               0x0001  /* implements Bluetooth coexistance */
> #define B43_BFL_PACTRL                  0x0002  /* GPIO 9 controlling the PA */
> #define B43_BFL_AIRLINEMODE             0x0004  /* implements GPIO 13 radio
> disable indication */
> #define B43_BFL_RSSI                    0x0008  /* software calculates nrssi slope. */
> #define B43_BFL_ENETSPI                 0x0010  /* has ephy roboswitch spi */
> #define B43_BFL_XTAL_NOSLOW             0x0020  /* no slow clock available */
> #define B43_BFL_CCKHIPWR                0x0040  /* can do high power CCK transmission */
> #define B43_BFL_ENETADM                 0x0080  /* has ADMtek switch */
> #define B43_BFL_ENETVLAN                0x0100  /* can do vlan */
> #define B43_BFL_AFTERBURNER             0x0200  /* supports Afterburner mode */
> #define B43_BFL_NOPCI                   0x0400  /* leaves PCI floating */
> #define B43_BFL_FEM                     0x0800  /* supports the Front End Module */
> #define B43_BFL_EXTLNA                  0x1000  /* has an external LNA */
> #define B43_BFL_HGPA                    0x2000  /* had high gain PA */
> #define B43_BFL_BTCMOD                  0x4000  /* BFL_BTCOEXIST is given in alternate GPIOs */
> #define B43_BFL_ALTIQ                   0x8000  /* alternate I/Q settings */
>
> You can see we have them duplicated.
>
> The real solution would be to move defines into one shared place (ssb).

John, if you are looking for a quick fix, I'd prefer to replace that
SSB_PCICORE_BFL_NOPCI with 0x400.

As I said, the real fix will change code in b43, gige, driver_pci, b43legacy.

-- 
Rafał
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux