On 07/22/2011 12:30 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > 2011/7/16 Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@xxxxxxxxxx>: >> This patch series adds support for embedded devices like bcm47xx to >> bcma. Bcma is used on bcm4716 and bcm4718 SoCs as the system bus and >> replaced ssb used on older devices. With these patches my bcm4716 >> device boots up till it tries to access the flash, because the serial >> flash chip is unsupported for now, this will be my next task. This adds >> support for MIPS cores, interrupt configuration and the serial console. >> >> These patches are not containing all functions needed to get the SoC to >> fully work and support every feature, but it is a good start. >> These patches are now integrated in OpenWrt for everyone how wants to >> test them. >> >> This was tested with a BCM4704 device (SoC with ssb bus), a BCM4716 >> device and a pcie wireless card supported by bcma. >> >> >> @Rafał: If you are fine with the bcma patches could you please give >> your Signed-off on them. >> >> @Ralf: Could you please merger this into the mips tree so that it will be in linux-3.1. > > ML for bcma is linux-wireless. Should we pass that patches "via" Ralf > or John? Using linux-wireless (and John's tree) makes more sense to > me, as we will work on the same tree and will get less merge > conflicts. However don't take me as Linux development style guru, just > my POV. > Hi, Thank you for your reviewing. I talked about this with Florian Fainelli and he said that the patches should rather pass Ralf then John, but merging would be easier when they are passing John. I do not have a problem with both solutions and rebasing it to an other tree is no problem for me. John and Ralf, who wants to take these patches? ;-) Hauke -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
