W dniu 6 lipca 2011 17:40 użytkownik Michael Büsch <m@xxxxxxx> napisał:
> On Tue, 5 Jul 2011 23:54:08 +0200
> Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/wireless/b43/bus.c | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/net/wireless/b43/bus.h | 3 +
>> drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c | 7 +++
>> 3 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/bus.c b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/bus.c
>> index 4200713..f56604f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/bus.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/bus.c
>> @@ -23,6 +23,106 @@
>> #include "b43.h"
>> #include "bus.h"
>>
>> +/* BCMA */
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_B43_BCMA
>> +static inline int b43_bus_bcma_bus_may_powerdown(struct b43_bus_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> + return 0; /* bcma_bus_may_powerdown(dev->bdev->bus); */
>> +}
>
> Why is this inline?
> You can't inline and take a pointer of the function at the same time.
> (The compiler will workaround this by generating multiple versions of
> the function, of which at least one is not inline).
> So remove it, please. Same below...
I didn't know about any such a limitation.
Just for sure: did you really mean "pointer of the function"? Cause my
function is taking pointer of the struct, not pointer of function.
--
Rafał
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
