On 06/06/2011 12:51 PM, RafaÅ MiÅecki wrote:
W dniu 6 czerwca 2011 12:32 uÅytkownik George Kashperko
<george@xxxxxxxxxxx> napisaÅ:
Hi,
Hauke,
My idea for naming schema was to use:
bcma_host_TYPE_*
Like:
bcma_host_pci_*
bcma_host_sdio_*
You are using:
bcma_host_bcma_*
What do you think about changing this to:
bcma_host_embedded_*
or just some:
bcma_host_emb_*
?
Does it make more sense to you? I was trying to keep names in bcma
really clear, so every first-time-reader can see differences between
hosts, host and driver, etc.
how about bcma_host_soc ?
We get then inconsistency with "BCMA_HOSTTYPE_EMBEDDED". I'd like to
1) See something like bcma_host_emb...
xor
2) Use bcma_host_soc_* and BCMA_HOSTTYPE_SOC
I would go for option 2). It more clearly says what it is. Embedded is a
broader term. As an example, a handset is an embedded device, but it may
use BCMA_HOSTTYPE_SDIO.
Gr. AvS
--
Almost nobody dances sober, unless they happen to be insane.
-- H.P. Lovecraft --
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
