On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 18:36, Roland Vossen <rvossen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Julian, > >> On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 02:37, Roland Vossen<rvossen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Hello Julian, >>> >>> the structure definition itself is already in a header file (aiutils.h). >>> Probably you are referring to the forward declaration used in the patch? >> >> Exactly, it probably shouldn't be here as the header file that >> includes the structure should arguably already be included. > > I am afraid I have to disagree with you, for the reason that by including > the header file you introduce unnecessary coupling. Let me elaborate. If a > .c file does not need to know the contents of a struct, but it only needs to > know that a pointer to an opaque struct, then one should not provide the C > file with knowledge on the internals of the struct (hence not include the .h > file). Fair enough. I guess I just don't like void pointers. Thanks, -- Julian Calaby Email: julian.calaby@xxxxxxxxx Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/ .Plan: http://sites.google.com/site/juliancalaby/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
