On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 22:15 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> On 05/30/2011 04:34 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > I'm happy to see rtl8192se in Linux 3.0-rc1. I noticed that it claims
> > PCI device ID 10ec:8192, which is already claimed by staging driver
> > rtl8192e. Is it intended to replace that driver, or are there two
> > different devices with that ID which they will distinguish in their
> > probe functions?
> >
> > If is intended to replace rtl8192e, shouldn't it also claim these device
> > IDs?
> >
> > /* Corega */
> > { PCI_DEVICE(0x07aa, 0x0044) },
> > { PCI_DEVICE(0x07aa, 0x0047) },
>
> The RTL8192E is a different device than the RTL8192SE, thus rtl8192se will not
> replace rtl8192e. The way to tell them apart is the PCIe revision id. At
> present, I don't have a method to use that info to load the correct driver, but
> I will be working on it.
It doesn't matter too much if both drivers get loaded, so long as their
respective probe() functions fail cleanly and return -ENODEV when called
for the wrong device.
> In addition, I need to acquire an RTL8192E.
>
> No, rtl8192se should not claim those Corega devices.
Thanks.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
