Hi John, I found an oops in wl12xx when trying to run a passive scheduled scan. While at it, I found a few other bugs with the generation of the passive and DFS scan lists. This series fixes all this. Do you think it can be included in 2.6.40 still? At least the fourth patch is very important because it fixes the oops. If you want to take only the oops fix but not the rest, I can make a separate patch for 2.6.40 to prevent the oops by simply returning -EOPNOTSUPP. What do you think? Should we push all patches to fix this correctly for 2.6.40 or should we just quick-fix the oops? Please let me know what you prefer. This series replaces the "fix oops in sched_scan when forcing a passive scan" I have sent earlier. Cheers, Luca. Luciano Coelho (4): wl12xx: fix passive and radar channel generation for scheduled scan wl12xx: fix DFS channels handling in scheduled scan wl12xx: add separate config value for DFS dwell time on sched scan wl12xx: fix oops in sched_scan when forcing a passive scan drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/conf.h | 3 ++ drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/main.c | 1 + drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/scan.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/scan.h | 3 ++ 4 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
