On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 17:58 +0200, BjÃrn Smedman wrote: > > Yes, in theory that's possible, but apparently no driver actually did > > this correctly. Also, it didn't seem like anyone really cares, and we > > need to enforce some restrictions because otherwise drivers will end up > > doing it wrong, and you'll end up having a beacon interval of 200 while > > advertising 150 for example, which will totally throw off powersaving > > clients. > > I'm very interested in having multiple AP vifs with different beacon > intervals. If we're going to just fail anyway in this case can't we do > that from the drivers instead? I would also prefer that from an > aesthetic point of view, instead of having broken logic in the drivers > "protected" by extra verification in cfg80211. We can't fail from the drivers, they don't have a failure path. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
