On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 08:57 -0700, ext Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 4:21 AM, Juuso Oikarinen > <juuso.oikarinen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi John, all, > > > > The following is an excerpt of the db.txt from most recent > > wireless-regdb. > > > > country US: > > (2402 - 2472 @ 40), (3, 27) > > (5170 - 5250 @ 40), (3, 17) > > (5250 - 5330 @ 40), (3, 20), DFS > > (5490 - 5600 @ 40), (3, 20), DFS > > (5650 - 5710 @ 40), (3, 20), DFS > > (5735 - 5835 @ 40), (3, 30) > > > > country CA: > > (2402 - 2472 @ 40), (3, 27) > > (5170 - 5250 @ 40), (3, 17) > > (5250 - 5330 @ 40), (3, 20), DFS > > (5490 - 5710 @ 40), (3, 20), DFS > > (5735 - 5835 @ 40), (3, 30) > > > > We are under the understanding that the Canadian national rules deny the > > usage of the 5490-5710 range of frequencies (ref from RSS-210), but the > > range is present in the allowed range of frequencies for the CA region: > > > > "Additional requirements for the band 5600-5650 MHz: Until further > > notice, devices subject to this Section shall not be capable of > > transmitting in the band 5600-5650 MHz, so that Environment Canada > > weather radars operating in this band are protected." > > > > Then again, the FCC rules (15.407) do not prohibit the mentioned range > > of frequencies within the US (with DFS and limited power level) but in > > the regulatory database that range is missing. > > > > > > Is there a bug in the regulatory db, or am I misunderstanding something? > > > Michael, any opinion on this? Any take on this one? -Juuso -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
