On Friday 06 May 2011 09:45 PM, Vasanth Thiagarajan wrote:
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 09:24:51PM +0530, Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan wrote:
From: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan<mshajakhan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan<mshajakhan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c | 7 +++++--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
index 3de115d..2b78ea2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
@@ -2267,7 +2267,7 @@ static void ath9k_flush(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, bool drop)
timeout = 1;
for (j = 0; j< timeout; j++) {
- int npend = 0;
+ bool npend = false;
if (j)
usleep_range(1000, 2000);
@@ -2276,7 +2276,10 @@ static void ath9k_flush(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, bool drop)
if (!ATH_TXQ_SETUP(sc, i))
continue;
- npend += ath9k_has_pending_frames(sc,&sc->tx.txq[i]);
+ npend = ath9k_has_pending_frames(sc,&sc->tx.txq[i]);
+
+ if (npend)
+ break;
We need not bail out as soon as there is a pending frame in a queue.
There is a possibility that it could be transmitted successfully by
the time the given timeout expires.
Hi Vasanth,
the timeout is before we enter into the loop for checking pending
frames, so I thought it won't be affecting it. am I missing something?
please tell me.
thanks,
shafi
Vasanth
.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
