Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH 0/3] ssb/b43(legacy): clean dangling cores workarounds

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2011/5/8 Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On 05/08/2011 12:09 PM, RafaÅ MiÅecki wrote:
>>
>> There is no perfect place for this workarounds, but keeping it in ssb
>> sounds
>> more reasonable.
>> 1) We already have in ssb similar workarounds for different cores
>> 2) We do not register not working devices in system
>> 3) We do not duplicate code in b43 and b43legacy
>>
>> RafaÅ MiÅecki (3):
>> Â ssb: update list of devices supporting multiple 80211 cores
>> Â b43: drop ssb-duplicated workaround for dangling cores
>> Â b43legacy: drop ssb-duplicated workaround for dangling cores
>>
>> Âdrivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c    |  17 -----------------
>> Âdrivers/net/wireless/b43legacy/main.c | Â 18 ------------------
>> Âdrivers/ssb/scan.c          Â|  Â5 ++++-
>> Â3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> First of all, a minor grammatical mistake. It should be "this workaround" as
> there is only only one workaround discussed here.
>
> Secondly, "we do not register not working" is a little awkward. "We do not
> register inactive devices..." would be better.
>
> Finally, this commit message will never show up in the git commit logs. I
> think this info is valuable, thus it should be in the real commits.
>
> My suggestion for the [1/3] patch is something like:
>
> "Many of the BCM43xx chips contain cores that are attached to the SSB, but
> are inactive as they do not connect to the external environment. These must
> not be registered. Several of these types are handled in driver ssb;
> however, the specific case of an inactive 802.11 cores is now treated in b43
> and b43legacy. Although the current setup works, this minor change will
> place all such workarounds in ssb, and simplify the code in drivers b43 and
> b43legacy."
>
> In each of the other two patches, add a commit message something like:
>
> "Remove the code to detect inactive 802.11 cores, as that function is now
> done in ssb."

Thank you for reviewing.


> I have not yet tested the patches, but will do so soon.

Oh, do you have some device with 2 active cores? Nice :)

-- 
RafaÅ
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux