On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 16:15 +0530, Sujith wrote:
> - if (local->hw.flags & IEEE80211_HW_HAS_RATE_CONTROL)
> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +static inline int drv_set_bitrate_mask(struct ieee80211_local *local,
> + struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata,
> + const struct cfg80211_bitrate_mask *mask)
> +{
> + int ret = -ENOTSUPP;
I didn't even know -ENOTSUPP existed, but shouldn't it stay -EOPNOTSUPP?
johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
