On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 10:44 +0200, Antonio Ospite wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 13:44:02 +0200
> Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 13:41 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> >
> > > > + * static struct regulator_consumer_supply pcap_regulator_V6_consumers [] = {
> > > > + * { .dev_name = "rfkill-regulator.0", supply = "vrfkill" },
> > > > + * };
> > >
> > > It's a comment, but it should be .supply = (missing the .)
> > >
>
> well spotted, I'll fix this.
This is the comment I was referring to -- I got confused and thought
this was a struct rfkill_regulator_platform_data.
> That's how the regulator framework works, I know Mark already replied to
> you but I try to elaborate more for the records and to organize my
> thoughts about that:
[snip explanation]
Thanks, ok, I'm just not familiar with the regulator framework and got
confused about the various structs involved.
So the only thing I see wrong is the missing . above, not sure if you
care enough to resend :-)
johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
