Search Linux Wireless

Re: Questions about rt2800usb

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > Here's my vote against removing the rt2870sta from
> staging. Some longstanding issues with latency and duplicate
> packets (rt307x) are persistent with rt2800usb, whereas
> rt2870sta works fine.
> >
> > my two cents
> >
> > Walter
> 
> Personally, I've had the opposite (since the patch to
> disable power
> management on rt2800usb.)  rt2870sta hasn't been
> noticeably more
> stable, and in fact, I tend to see div0 bugs quite often
> when using
> it.  That said, I'm using Azurewave rt3070s.

My vote went against only because of this: 
(rt3070 - 148f:3070)

Ping gateway with staging:

PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_req=1 ttl=64 time=4.34 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_req=2 ttl=64 time=4.70 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_req=3 ttl=64 time=1.61 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_req=4 ttl=64 time=1.68 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_req=5 ttl=64 time=1.33 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_req=6 ttl=64 time=6.57 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_req=7 ttl=64 time=4.45 ms
^C
--- 192.168.1.1 ping statistics ---
7 packets transmitted, 7 received, 0% packet loss, time 6009ms


Now pinging gateway with rt2800usb:
PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_req=2 ttl=64 time=647 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_req=3 ttl=64 time=1590 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_req=4 ttl=64 time=583 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_req=5 ttl=64 time=29.2 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_req=6 ttl=64 time=1674 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_req=7 ttl=64 time=667 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_req=7 ttl=64 time=668 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_req=8 ttl=64 time=1645 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_req=9 ttl=64 time=637 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_req=10 ttl=64 time=1.38 ms
^C
--- 192.168.1.1 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 9 received, +1 duplicates, 10% packet loss, time 9032ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 1.384/814.547/1674.284/588.666 ms, pipe 2


Steev, you mentioned there was a fix? Could you please point which patch resolves this?

I'll be glad to drop the staging driver if rt2800usb does not lag anymore.

Walter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux