On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 04:09:32PM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 03/31/2011 03:51 PM, Russell King wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 03:48:20PM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: > >> How it can? Packed only tells the compiler to have one byte alignment > >> steps. And it should not matter here as all the members are 32-bit long. > > > > It also tells the compiler that it may be misaligned, so to avoid > > alignment faults it will use byte loads/stores. > > No, it should not (if offsetof % sizeof == 0). Otherwise it's a bug in > the compiler. > > Am I missing something? $ cat t1.c struct foo { unsigned long bar; } __attribute__((packed)); unsigned long baz(struct foo *f) { return f->bar; } $ arm-linux-gcc -O2 -S -o - t1.c ... .global baz .type baz, %function baz: @ args = 0, pretend = 0, frame = 0 @ frame_needed = 0, uses_anonymous_args = 0 @ link register save eliminated. ldrb r3, [r0, #0] @ zero_extendqisi2 ldrb r2, [r0, #1] @ zero_extendqisi2 ldrb r1, [r0, #2] @ zero_extendqisi2 orr r3, r3, r2, asl #8 ldrb r0, [r0, #3] @ zero_extendqisi2 orr r3, r3, r1, asl #16 orr r0, r3, r0, asl #24 mov pc, lr .size baz, .-baz .ident "GCC: (GNU) 4.3.5" .section .note.GNU-stack,"",%progbits It does this because with the packed attribute, it can't make assumptions about the alignment of 'f'. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html