Richard Schütz wrote: >> If the AP is set to HT20, this driver doesn't use IEEE 802.11n any more, >> or, to say it more specific: the selected bit rate is max. 64 Mb/s and >> the performance is even worse. > > Of course it uses 802.11n, but only with 20 MHz channel width, so the > data rate is lower than with 40 Mhz channel width. The highest rate of > 802.11g is 54 Mbit/s anyway. I know - but there isn't any difference between g and n with 20 MHz channel in real performance. That's why I wrote the driver wouldn't use n any more. But this wasn't correct with respect of the technical view. >> I'm wondering at all, why the ath9k driver doesn't switch to 300 Mb/s: >> the rt3572sta-driver doesn't have any problem with both settings. > > Your AR9285 only supports up to 150 Mbit/s. Now it's clear, why 150 Mbit/s is the maximum. Klaus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
