Search Linux Wireless

Re: Aggregation problem with rt2800 AP and Intel 5100 STA

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 22:41, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 21:40 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
>> On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 22:38 +0200, Emmanuel Grumbach wrote:
>>
>> > >> STA -> AP  nullfunc PM=1
>> > >> AP -> STA  AMPDU (seqnr 3106 - 3112)
>> > >> AP -> STA  AMPDU (seqnr 3106 - 3112), retry
>> > >> AP -> STA  AMPDU (seqnr 3106 - 3112), retry
>> > >> AP -> STA  AMPDU (seqnr 3106 - 3112), retry
>> > >> AP -> STA  AMPDU (seqnr 3106 - 3112), retry
>> > >> AP -> STA  AMPDU (seqnr 3106 - 3112), retry
>> > >> ...
>> > >> STA -> AP nullfunc PM=0
>> > >> ...
>> >
>> > Hold on, why do mac80211 send a frame to a sleeping station ?
>> > Am I stupid or is this buggy ?
>>
>> Heh, neither. This happens when the frame is already queued on the
>> hardware queue.
>
> Of course, most (sane) hardware/firmware designs have some way to avoid
> that race by having the device itself note the WAKE->SLEEP transition,
> and the requiring the driver to tell the device about the SLEEP->WAKE
> transition, which enables us to never do this (sending a frame to a
> station that is now asleep).
>

good point. For the same reasons, DELBA Deauth and friends are handled
in FW too...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux