On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 12:20 -0700, greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> + sf += snprintf(buf, mxln - sf, "0x%x", local->hw.flags);
> + if (local->hw.flags & IEEE80211_HW_HAS_RATE_CONTROL)
> + sf += snprintf(buf + sf, mxln - sf, " HAS_RATE_CONTROL");
Wouldn't it be easier to read with "<flag>\n" rather than " <flag>"?
> +static const struct file_operations hwflags_ops = {
> + .read = hwflags_read,
> + .open = mac80211_open_file_generic,
> + .llseek = default_llseek,
> +};
I think it'd make sense to split up the DEBUGFS_READONLY_FILE macro and
use it?
johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
