On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 7:38 AM, Juuso Oikarinen <juuso.oikarinen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 23:03 +0200, ext Eliad Peller wrote: >> When passing a tx frame, the driver incorrectly set desc->tid >> with the ac instead of the actual tid. >> >> It has some serious implications when using 802.11n + QoS, >> as the fw starts a BlockAck with the wrong tid (which finally >> cause beacon loss and disconnection / some fw crash) >> >> Fix it by using the actual tid stored in skb->priority. > > How will the firmware handle the TIDs larger than 3, as currently to the > firmware it appears only TID's 0-3 are configured, and the rest are > whatever values happen to be there default? > that's a good question. according to the fw guys, the fw auto-maps the tid to the correct ac. the confusing thing is that ACX_TID_CFG actually gets AC as its input (in the queue_id param) rather than TID. thus, only 0-3 (ACs, not TIDs) are configured. Eliad. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html