2011/3/18 George Kashperko <george@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > Current ssb code ideology isn't really good place to start with support > for ai backplanes. Its really great to see you willing to get ai > supported in mainline but I'm sure this should be done apart from the > ssb code and not even with one as the design decisions origin. Several > concepts the ssb is based on are not designed to support anything else > than ocp/sb and will require workarounds to suport ai. > Thanks to Michael I had a time to think over the possibly code > abstraction for shared sb and ai support. And while I'm still sure the > patchwork for ai over ssb support is of good use as some intermediate > decision to support ai-based hardware in sertain distributions but now I > support Michael in that such (hopefully) a temporary buildups should not > be in mainline. Please, give some concrete arguments, which part of design does not match AI. My patch has shown we need to duplicate 40% of SSB's scanning code. What for example about pci.c? Which functions from that file won't be duplicated in totally separated? -- RafaÅ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
