On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Vivek Natarajan <vnatarajan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Vivek Natarajan <vnatarajan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Was this a stable fix? If not why not?
>
> This certainly smells like a stable fix
OK so AR9485 1.1 support did not make it into 2.6.38, and this fix is
applicable only to AR9485 1.1 so the patch in question is not
applicable to stable. The 2.6.38 release however does have AR9485 1.0
support. Will we have any devices in the field with AR9485 1.0 ? Did
that revision not require a similar fix? On 2.6.38 and on linux-next I
see we have for 1.0:
/* Awake Setting */
INIT_INI_ARRAY(&ah->iniPcieSerdes,
ar9485_1_0_pcie_phy_pll_on_clkreq_disable_L1,
ARRAY_SIZE(ar9485_1_0_pcie_phy_pll_on_clkreq_disable_L1),
2);
/* Sleep Setting */
INIT_INI_ARRAY(&ah->iniPcieSerdesLowPower,
ar9485_1_0_pcie_phy_pll_on_clkreq_enable_L1,
ARRAY_SIZE(ar9485_1_0_pcie_phy_pll_on_clkreq_enable_L1),
2);
Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
