Sorry, terminal cut off.
diff --git a/net/mac80211/rx.c b/net/mac80211/rx.c
index a6701ed..0467ec8 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/rx.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/rx.c
@@ -605,13 +605,14 @@ static void ieee80211_sta_reorder_release(struct
ieee80211_hw *hw,
continue;
}
if (!time_after(jiffies, tid_agg_rx->reorder_time[j] +
- HT_RX_REORDER_BUF_TIMEOUT))
+ HT_RX_REORDER_BUF_TIMEOUT) && skipped)
goto set_release_timer;
-#ifdef CONFIG_MAC80211_HT_DEBUG
- if (net_ratelimit())
+#if 1
+//#ifdef CONFIG_MAC80211_HT_DEBUG
+// if (net_ratelimit())
wiphy_debug(hw->wiphy,
- "release an RX reorder
frame due to timeout on earlier frames\n");
+ "release an RX reorder
frame due to timeout on earlier frames (skipped=%d)\n", skipped);
#endif
ieee80211_release_reorder_frame(hw, tid_agg_rx, j);
@@ -680,6 +681,7 @@ static bool
ieee80211_sta_manage_reorder_buf(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
* size release some previous frames to make room for this one.
*/
if (!seq_less(mpdu_seq_num, head_seq_num + buf_size)) {
+ printk("New seq exceeds buffering window: %d, %d\n",
mpdu_seq_num, head_seq_num);
head_seq_num = seq_inc(seq_sub(mpdu_seq_num, buf_size));
/* release stored frames up to new head to stack */
ieee80211_release_reorder_frames(hw, tid_agg_rx, head_seq_num);
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Daniel Halperin
<dhalperi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> At the receiver (AP in this case) side, hacked from mac80211. The
> following diff includes one more mac80211 fix I haven't yet sent to
> the list.
>
> Dan
>
> diff --git a/net/mac80211/rx.c b/net/mac80211/rx.c
> index a6701ed..0467ec8 100644
> --- a/net/mac80211/rx.c
> +++ b/net/mac80211/rx.c
> @@ -605,13 +605,14 @@ static void ieee80211_sta_reorder_release(struct
> ieee80211 continue;
> }
> if (!time_after(jiffies, tid_agg_rx->reorder_time[j] +
> - HT_RX_REORDER_BUF_TIMEOUT))
> + HT_RX_REORDER_BUF_TIMEOUT) && skipped)
> goto set_release_timer;
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_MAC80211_HT_DEBUG
> - if (net_ratelimit())
> +#if 1
> +//#ifdef CONFIG_MAC80211_HT_DEBUG
> +// if (net_ratelimit())
> wiphy_debug(hw->wiphy,
> - "release an RX reorder
> frame due to + "release an
> RX reorder frame due to #endif
> ieee80211_release_reorder_frame(hw, tid_agg_rx, j);
>
> @@ -680,6 +681,7 @@ static bool
> ieee80211_sta_manage_reorder_buf(struct ieee8021 * size
> release some previous frames to make room for this one.
> */
> if (!seq_less(mpdu_seq_num, head_seq_num + buf_size)) {
> + printk("New seq exceeds buffering window: %d, %d\n",
> mpdu_seq_nu head_seq_num =
> seq_inc(seq_sub(mpdu_seq_num, buf_size));
> /* release stored frames up to new head to stack */
> ieee80211_release_reorder_frames(hw, tid_agg_rx, head_seq_num);
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Johannes Berg
> <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 11:16 -0700, Daniel Halperin wrote:
>>
>>> [341349.271337] New seq exceeds buffering window: 2797, 2766
>>
>> quick q (on the phone right now) - where's that message from?
>>
>> johannes
>>
>>
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
