On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:20:02AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 09:12 +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > > > > But perhaps we need a more generic fix in wait.h for the future. Maybe > > we should decouple definitions of TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE and friends from > > sched.h into separate header and include that header in wait.h as > > well? > > No! That only makes the mess worse, the only sane option is to fix > things so that wait.h can include sched.h and that is non-trivial. I was not aware of recent discussion http://marc.info/?t=129829886000004&r=1&w=2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
