Hi Stanislaw, On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 05:33 -0800, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > There is no need to have separate iwl-agn-rx.c file after iwlegacy > split. > > Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/Makefile | 2 +- > drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rx.c | 264 ----------------------------- > drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.h | 2 - > drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-rx.c | 226 ++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 4 files changed, 225 insertions(+), 269 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rx.c > I got the following warning: drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-rx.c:506:6: warning: symbol 'iwl_rx_statistics' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-rx.c:575:6: warning: symbol 'iwl_reply_statistics' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-rx.c:600:6: warning: symbol 'iwl_rx_missed_beacon_notif' was not declared. Should it be static? when I compile with sparse Thanks Wey -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
