On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 13:54 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > + * @NL80211_FREQUENCY_ATTR_RADAR_CLEAR: during a full CAC no interference has > > + * been detected. > > Why do you need a flag for clear, can you simply count on the > lack of the flag as the "clear" state? This really means CAC_DONE_AND_FOUND_CLEAR. Though now that has me wondering, maybe it should be CAC_DONE and BUSY as separate flags? But then the checks have to be (CAC_DONE && !BUSY), which is more expressive but also more complex and error prone. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
