On Feb 24, 2011, at 10:20 PM, Julian Calaby wrote:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 17:15, Justin P. Mattock
<justinmattock@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The patch below removes an extra "l" in the word.
Random thought:
Not that I'm complaining about your work here, and not that commits
are a finite resource, but would it be possible for you to collect
your spelling changes into slightly bigger commits before sending them
off?
E.g. instead of sending off 21 patches to remove 21 erroneous l's, why
not do a full spelling check on these 21 files, then send off 21
patches to fix *all* the spelling mistakes in each file? You could
even group them up by directory if you liked.
Thanks,
--
Julian Calaby
Email: julian.calaby@xxxxxxxxx
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/
.Plan: http://sites.google.com/site/juliancalaby/
yeah.. I agree, its just people have said that I should individually
send each patch to each maintainer subsystem etc...
(rather would just send one with everything on it, but then might make
things more confusing)
Justin P. Mattock
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
