Dear John, Thanks for your comment. I also tried to duplicate this on x86 environment, but I've never seen this yet. So this might perhaps have somthing to do with an ARM-specific implementation in the kernel. > All Have you ever experienced something like a crash like this on ARM-based platform when you use AR9271? Best Regards, Takashi Kawamoto On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 09:52:01 -0500 "John W. Linville" <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 02:17:07PM +0900, Takashi Kawamoto wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > > > When I make an AR9271 to perform as an iperf client with > > compat-wireless-2011-01-30, a Kernel Panic occurs. > > > > [log] > > ======================================================================= > > BUG: spinlock lockup on CPU#1, iperf/552, 9f9aade4 > > [<80030ca4>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xdc) from [<801835ac>] (do_raw_spin_lock+0x14c/0x168) > > [<801835ac>] (do_raw_spin_lock+0x14c/0x168) from [<802e47c0>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x10/0x18) > > [<802e47c0>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x10/0x18) from [<7f17218c>] (hif_usb_send+0x34/0x26c [ath9k_htc]) > > [<7f17218c>] (hif_usb_send+0x34/0x26c [ath9k_htc]) from [<7f17153c>] (htc_issue_send+0x64/0x6c [ath9k_htc]) > > [<7f17153c>] (htc_issue_send+0x64/0x6c [ath9k_htc]) from [<7f171564>] (htc_send+0x20/0x24 [ath9k_htc]) > > [<7f171564>] (htc_send+0x20/0x24 [ath9k_htc]) from [<7f1746d4>] (ath9k_htc_tx_start+0x23c/0x244 [ath9k_htc]) > > [<7f1746d4>] (ath9k_htc_tx_start+0x23c/0x244 [ath9k_htc]) from [<7f1751c8>] (ath9k_htc_tx+0x7c/0xcc [ath9k_htc]) > > [<7f1751c8>] (ath9k_htc_tx+0x7c/0xcc [ath9k_htc]) from [<7f0c50d4>] (__ieee80211_tx+0x124/0x194 [mac80211]) > > [<7f0c50d4>] (__ieee80211_tx+0x124/0x194 [mac80211]) from [<7f0c51e4>] (ieee80211_tx+0xa0/0x1e0 [mac80211]) > > [<7f0c51e4>] (ieee80211_tx+0xa0/0x1e0 [mac80211]) from [<7f0c6590>] (ieee80211_subif_start_xmit+0x6c0/0x6f8 [mac80211]) > > [<7f0c6590>] (ieee80211_subif_start_xmit+0x6c0/0x6f8 [mac80211]) from [<80269220>] (dev_hard_start_xmit+0x1f8/0x2e0) > > [<80269220>] (dev_hard_start_xmit+0x1f8/0x2e0) from [<8027878c>] (sch_direct_xmit+0x70/0x1c8) > > [<8027878c>] (sch_direct_xmit+0x70/0x1c8) from [<802696e0>] (dev_queue_xmit+0x290/0x428) > > [<802696e0>] (dev_queue_xmit+0x290/0x428) from [<80287320>] (ip_finish_output+0x250/0x2a8) > > [<80287320>] (ip_finish_output+0x250/0x2a8) from [<80285178>] (ip_local_out+0x24/0x28) > > [<80285178>] (ip_local_out+0x24/0x28) from [<80286cac>] (ip_queue_xmit+0x2f4/0x35c) > > [<80286cac>] (ip_queue_xmit+0x2f4/0x35c) from [<80299010>] (tcp_transmit_skb+0x74c/0x7b8) > > [<80299010>] (tcp_transmit_skb+0x74c/0x7b8) from [<8029b5dc>] (tcp_write_xmit+0x860/0x978) > > [<8029b5dc>] (tcp_write_xmit+0x860/0x978) from [<8029b730>] (tcp_push_one+0x3c/0x48) > > [<8029b730>] (tcp_push_one+0x3c/0x48) from [<8028f840>] (tcp_sendmsg+0x864/0xaa4) > > [<8028f840>] (tcp_sendmsg+0x864/0xaa4) from [<80258ecc>] (sock_aio_write+0xe0/0xe8) > > [<80258ecc>] (sock_aio_write+0xe0/0xe8) from [<800bba20>] (do_sync_write+0x94/0xe0) > > [<800bba20>] (do_sync_write+0x94/0xe0) from [<800bc460>] (vfs_write+0xc4/0x154) > > [<800bc460>] (vfs_write+0xc4/0x154) from [<800bc59c>] (sys_write+0x3c/0x68) > > [<800bc59c>] (sys_write+0x3c/0x68) from [<8002a220>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x2c) > > ======================================================================= > > My guess would be that somehow you are leaking hif_dev->tx.tx_lock, > and then hanging when trying to retake it in hif_usb_send_tx. > Unfortunately, it is not obvious to me how that might happen... > > > An environment of AR9271's host is as follows. > > > > [Host Environment] > > ======================================================================= > > CPU : ARM11MP > > Kernel : 2.6.33 (SMP enabled) > > Distribution: Zoran Quatro inferno > > ======================================================================= > > > > As long as I see, this panic happens under the following conditions. > > > > (1) When sending a data frame > > When AR9271 performs as an iperf server, this panic appears less > > frequently than as a client. > > > > (1) When transmission throughput is relatively high > > For example, this panic never seems to appear when Ping > > communication is performed. > > > > (2) When multi processor mode is enabled > > When SMP option of the kernel is disabled (CONFIG_SMP=m), this > > panic doesn't occur. > > > > I've not duplicated the same on a x86 environment yet. > > > > I suspect that spinlock usage in Tx routines of ath9k/hif_usb.c must > > have something to do with this panic. > > > > Have anyone come across the similar crash as this? > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > Takashi Kawamoto > > > > ================================================== > > Takashi Kawamoto (E-Mail : tkawamoto@xxxxxxxx) > > silex technology,Inc. > > Software Engineering Division > > Phone:+81-774-98-3877 FAX:+81-774-98-3678 > > ================================================== > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in > > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > > > -- > John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you > linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx might be all we have. Be ready. ================================================== Takashi Kawamoto (E-Mail : tkawamoto@xxxxxxxx) silex technology,Inc. Software Engineering Division Phone:+81-774-98-3877 FAX:+81-774-98-3678 ================================================== -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html