On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 09:56 -0800, Nathaniel J. Smith wrote: > This patch should cause no behavioral change whatsoever. Right -- but it makes the TX path quite a bit more expensive on some architectures. Why is this necessary? There should be locking in most places already, and where not it should be easy to move this under the existing lock. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
