On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 08:16:33AM -0800, Wey-Yi Guy wrote:
> remove plcp check for 3945, mark the function __maybe_unused
>
> Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxx> # .35+: c91d015: iwl3945: remove plcp check
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxx # 2.6.35+
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945.c
> index 3eb14fd..eb82341 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945.c
> @@ -408,7 +408,7 @@ static void iwl3945_accumulative_statistics(struct iwl_priv *priv,
> * When the plcp error is exceeding the thresholds, reset the radio
> * to improve the throughput.
> */
> -static bool iwl3945_good_plcp_health(struct iwl_priv *priv,
> +static bool __maybe_unused iwl3945_good_plcp_health(struct iwl_priv *priv,
> struct iwl_rx_packet *pkt)
> {
> bool rc = true;
I was aware about that warning, but did not fix it, because when I compile
kernel, I can see lot's of other warnings and I have plan to clean
that iwl3945 code.
Does it something that really need to be fixed in -stable? I mean
should we bother stable maintainers about that?
Stanislaw
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
