Ð ÐÑÐ, 09/02/2011 Ð 10:23 -0600, Larry Finger ÐÐÑÐÑ:
> On 02/09/2011 08:41 AM, George Kashperko wrote:
> > From: George Kashperko <george@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Modify irqflag routine to reuse tpsflag value rather than
> > reading TPSFLAG register once again. Change default "not
> > supported" value from 0x3F to -1.
> > Signed-off-by: George Kashperko <george@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/ssb/driver_mipscore.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/ssb/ssb_sb.c | 4 ++--
> > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > --- linux-next-20110203.orig/drivers/ssb/driver_mipscore.c 2011-02-08 16:14:57.000000000 +0200
> > +++ linux-next-20110203/drivers/ssb/driver_mipscore.c 2011-02-08 16:15:24.000000000 +0200
> > @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ unsigned int ssb_mips_irq(struct ssb_dev
> > unsigned int irq;
> >
> > irqflag = ssb_irqflag(dev);
> > - if (irqflag == 0x3f)
> > + if (irqflag == -1)
> > return 6;
> > ipsflag = ssb_read32(bus->mipscore.dev, SSB_IPSFLAG);
> > for (irq = 1; irq <= 4; irq++) {
> > --- linux-next-20110203.orig/drivers/ssb/ssb_sb.c 2011-02-08 16:14:57.000000000 +0200
> > +++ linux-next-20110203/drivers/ssb/ssb_sb.c 2011-02-08 16:15:24.000000000 +0200
> > @@ -175,10 +175,10 @@ static u32 ssb_irqflag_sb(struct ssb_dev
> > {
> > u32 tpsflag = ssb_read32(dev, SSB_TPSFLAG);
> > if (tpsflag)
> > - return ssb_read32(dev, SSB_TPSFLAG) & SSB_TPSFLAG_BPFLAG;
> > + return tpsflag & SSB_TPSFLAG_BPFLAG;
> > else
> > /* not irq supported */
> > - return 0x3f;
> > + return -1;
> > }
> >
> > static void ssb_core_ctl_flags_sb(struct ssb_device *dev, u32 mask,
>
> This one does not apply with the following:
>
> finger@larrylap:~/wireless-testing> quilt push
> Applying patch patches/ssb_AI_9
> patching file drivers/ssb/driver_mipscore.c
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 85 (offset 10 lines).
> can't find file to patch at input line 35
> Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
> The text leading up to this was:
> --------------------------
> |--- linux-next-20110203.orig/drivers/ssb/ssb_sb.c 2011-02-08
> 16:14:57.000000000 +0200
> |+++ linux-next-20110203/drivers/ssb/ssb_sb.c 2011-02-08 16:15:24.000000000 +0200
> --------------------------
> No file to patch. Skipping patch.
> 1 out of 1 hunk ignored
> Patch patches/ssb_AI_9 does not apply (enforce with -f)
>
> Larry
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
My apologises for that. Already posted that <[RFC9/11] SSB modify
irqflag treatment> is my fault - it should be 10/11 not 9/11. You might
be missed my post with this note. Again sorry. I've reposted it right
after with proper sequence number. Please just rm it. 9th in sequence
should be <[RFC9/11] SSB separate SB-specific code>
Regarding issues with 3/11 and 11/11 - im looking into right now. Might
we have different git state.
Have nice day,
George
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
