On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 09:21:30AM -0500, John W. Linville wrote: > On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 11:36:27PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > Adding Greg for real this time. > > > > Luis > > > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Vivek Natarajan <vnatarajan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> In a highly noisy environment, a data frame which is queued before > > >> a nullfunc frame on a different hw queue may be sent over the air > > >> after the tx completion of nullfunc frame. This causes the station > > >> to enter power save and the AP to see the station as awake and > > >> continues to send the data traffic. Fix this by draining all tx > > >> queues before we send the null function frame with PM bit set. > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Vivek Natarajan <vnatarajan@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Hm nice, this is a good example of one of those random not-so-critical > > > but still nice fixes which I wish would go to stable. John, Greg, any > > > qualms for such things to go to stable if they apply? It was my > > > impression we could send it, but I want to verify with both you guys > > > so neither we or John get bashed if we try to send it as a stable fix. > > I think the feeling is that it is silly to mark something for stable if > it is not important enough to be sent as a fix for the current release. I totally agree. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
