On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 14:12 -0800, Ben Greear wrote: > > But if we pretend all work is off-channel, won't it be OK to return from > > off-channel, even if it isn't really another channel? > > That should be fine unless a scan can run in conjunction > with work. Then, it could confuse scan's idea of whether it > is off or on channel. > > Seems they are currently mutually-exclusive, so I guess > it doesn't matter currently. > > I'll take a look at what it would take to do the power-save > stuff and we can then decide if it should be broken into > separate patches... Ok, thanks. > I'm seeing multiple APs reported in my testing. Receiving all beacons > seems to be related to setting the filter properly. I'm using ath9k > though...maybe other nics behave differently about this? > > Or maybe my NIC is so busy it never goes to power-save anyway? ath9k doesn't enable PS by default -- you'd have to enable it with iwconfig or iw. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
