On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 21:41 -0500, Bob Copeland wrote: > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> I don't think it's good to advocate a custom driver. They should be able > >> to use stock wpa_supplicant w/ nl80211 and put the extensions in the > >> hardware layer. > > > > Can you elaborate? > > From the wiki: > > "The proper approach would be to provide a custom driver_nl80211_android.c > wrapper for the modified wpa_supplicant in Android." > > I just don't think it's strictly necessary to ship a modified wpa_s. > Why is Android special when bog standard Linux gets by ok with > driver_nl80211? Agree, that is a dumb idea. What's that driver going to do? Use custom nl80211 extensions?! That way lies insanity. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
