David Gnedt <david.gnedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > With a dissacociated card I often encoutered very long scan delays. > > My guess is that it has something to do with the cards DTIM handling and > another firmware bug mentioned in the TI WLAN driver, which is described as > the card may never end scanning if the channel is overloaded because it > can't send probe requests. I think the firmware somehow also tries to > receive DTIM messages when the BSSID is not set. Therefore most of the time > it waits for DTIM messages and can't do scanning work. > > Anyway we can workaround this misbehaviour by setting the HIGH_PRIORITY > bit for scans in disassociated state. Now that's a weird problem. I wonder this wasn't reported with the fremantle kernels. How often did you see the problem? > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/wl1251/cmd.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/wl1251/cmd.c > @@ -419,7 +419,10 @@ int wl1251_cmd_scan(struct wl1251 *wl, u8 *ssid, size_t ssid_len, > struct wl1251_cmd_scan *cmd; > int i, ret = 0; > > - wl1251_debug(DEBUG_CMD, "cmd scan"); > + wl1251_debug(DEBUG_CMD, "cmd scan channels %d ssid(%d) '%s'", > + n_channels, ssid_len, ssid); ssid is not a valid string and hence you cannot print it with %s. > + /* > + * Use high priority scan when not associated to prevent fw issue > + * causing never-ending scans (sometimes 20+ minutes). > + * Note: This bug may be caused by the fw's DTIM handling. > + */ > + if (is_zero_ether_addr(wl->bssid)) > + cmd->params.scan_options |= WL1251_SCAN_OPT_PRIORITY_HIGH; Can you resend the patch with just this part and the accompanying defines, please? It's better to have debug messages improvements in a separate patch. -- Kalle Valo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html