On Thursday 20 January 2011 20:07:13 Johannes Berg wrote: > On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 21:54 +0300, Paul Fertser wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:50:43AM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Paul Fertser <fercerpav@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:37:20AM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > >> Huh? > > > > > > > > Christian asked me to add that info to the wiki, is something i wrote wrong? > > > > > > It is unclear to me, are you saying carl9170 does not support QoS and > > > aggregation? > > > > At the same time, apparently, yes. This commit[1] has more > > clarifications. > > > > [1] http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/chr/carl9170fw.git;a=commitdiff;h=39be7dc384e0dd45dc36b4b517fd9fae874b06f0 > > It could still do QoS but refuse aggregation sessions on anything but > TID 0 and 1? > Uh, no cc: me ;) ? I almost missed this one. Anyway, when I wrote that I tried a lot of possible workarounds. Including this suggestion [limit ampdu to tid 0 & 1], but it had no effect, the TX-QoS arbiter just gets stuck :(. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
