2011/1/9 Felix Fietkau <nbd@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > On 2011-01-09 7:15 AM, Björn Smedman wrote: >> >> I think we should also consider the added stability/saneness with this >> patch. I for one would be willing to live with some extra cpu load if >> that means the unstoppable rx dma problem can be contained (all the >> time). > > I don't think this patch has anything to do with the rx dma stop issue. Ok, so if you have a machine gun that can go off at any time and is impossible to stop you don't think it makes a difference where it's pointed? ;) Just kidding, and call me superstitious, but I would feel much better knowing ath9k is pointing that half-broken dma engine at it's own data only, at least until it's 100% stable. /Björn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
